www.xxx.com

SOYAYYA | ADDINI | ABINCI | KASUWANCI | TARIHI | LAFIYA | LABARAI | KIMIYA DA FASAHA


  • MACROECONOMICS POLICY OBJECTIVES
  • The Macroeconomic Policy Objectives
    a) Full employment
    Full employment has been ranked among the foremost objectives of economic
    policy. But there is no unanimity of views on the meaning of full employment. 
    Prof. Ackley regards it as a ―slippery concept.‖ But the credit of popularizing 
    goes to Keynes, and since the Second World War it has been accepted as one of 
    the important goals of macro economics policy.
    The classical economists always believed in the existence of full employment in 
    the economy. To them full employment was a normal situation and any 
    deviation from this was regarded as something abnormal. According to pigou, 
    the tendency of the economic system was to automatically provide full� employment in the labour market. Unemployment was a normal situation and 
    any deviation from this was regarded as something abnormal. According to 
    pigou the tendency of the economic system was to automatically provide full 
    employment in the labour market, employment resulted from rigidity in the 
    wage structure and interference in the working of market system in the form of 
    trade union legislation, minimum wage legislation, etc. full employment existed 
    when everybody who are the running rate of wages which‘s to be employed. 
    Those who are not prepared to work and the existing wage rate are not 
    unemployed in the pigovian sense because they are voluntarily unemployed. 
    However, no possibility of involuntarily unemployment in the sense that people 
    are prepaid to work but they could not find work. According to pigou, with 
    perfectly free completion- there will always be at work a strong tendency for 
    wage rate to be so related to demand that everybody is employed‖. However, 
    the classical view of full employment is consistence of the sum amount of 
    frictional, voluntary, seasonal, and structural.
    According to Keynes, full employment means the absence of involuntary 
    unemployment. In other word, full employment is a situation in which 
    everybody who wants to work gets work. Full employment so defined is 
    consistent with frictional and voluntary unemployment. Keynes assumed that 
    with a given organization, equipment and techniques, real wages and the 
    volume of out-put (and hence of employment)are uniquely co-related, so that, 
    in general an increase in employment can only occur to the accompaniment of 
    a decline in the rate of wages. Thus the problem of full employment is one of 
    maintaining adequate effective demand Keynes gave an alternative definition of 
    full employment at another place in his general theory thus: ―it is a situation in 
    which aggregate employment is inelastic in response to an increase in the 
    effective demand for its out-put. ―It means that the test of full employment is 
    when any further increase in effective demand is when increase in effective 
    demand is not accompanied by any increase in output. Since the supply of 
    output becomes inelastic at the full employment level, any further increase in 
    effective demand will lead to inflation in the economy. Thus the Keynesian 
    concept of full employment involves three conditions (i) reduction in the real 
    wage rate; (ii) increase in effective demand; and (iii) inelastic supply of output 
    at the level of full employment.
    According to Professor W.W. Hart attempting to define full employment raises 
    many people‘s blood pressure. Right so because there is hardly any economist 
    who does not define it in his own way. Lord Beveridge in his book full
    employment in a free society defined it as a situation where there was more
    vacant job than unemployed men so that normal lag between losing one job and 
    finding another will be very short. By full employment he does not mean zero 
    employment which means the full employment is not always full. There is 
    always a certain amount of frictional in the economy even when there is full 
    employment. He estimated frictional unemployment of 3% in a full 
    employment situation for England. But his pleading for more vacant jobs than 
    the unemployed cannot be accepted as the full employment level. According to 
    the America economic association committee, ―full employment is a situation 
    where all qualified person who want job at current wage rate find full-time� jobs.‖ It does not mean unemployment is zero. Here again like Beveridge, the 
    committee considered full employment to be consistent with some amount of 
    unemployment.
    b) Price stability or low inflation
    One of the policy objectives of monetary and fiscal policy are to stabilise the
    price level. Both economists and payment favour this policy because 
    fluctuations in prices bring uncertainty and instability to the economy. Rising 
    and falling prices bring uncertainly and instability to the economy. Rising and
    falling prices bring uncertainty and instability to the economy. Rising and
    falling prices are both bad because they bring unnecessary loss to some and 
    undue advantage to others. Again they are associated with business cycles. So a 
    policy of prices stability keeps the value of money stable, eliminates cyclical 
    fluctuations, brings economic stability, helps in reducing inequalities of income 
    and wealth, secures social justice and promotes economic welfare.
    However, there are certain difficulties in pursuing a policy of stable price level. 
    The first problem relates to the type of price level to be stabilised. Should the 
    relative or general price level be stabilised, or the wholesale or retail of 
    consumer goods or producers goods? There is no specific criterion with regards 
    to the choice of a price level which would include consumers‘ goods prices as 
    well as wages.‖ but this will necessitate change in the quantity of money and 
    not by as much as is implied in the stabilisation of consumer‘s goods price.
    c) Economic Growth and Development
    One of the most important objectives of macroeconomics policy in recent years
    has been the rapid economic growth of an economy. Economic growth is
    defined as ―the process whereby the real per capital income of a country 
    increases over a long period of time.‖ economic growth is measured by the 
    increase in the amount of goods and services produced in a country. A growing 
    economy produces more goods and services in each successive time period. 
    Thus growth occurs when an economy‘s productive capacity increases which, 
    in turn, is used to produce more goods and services. In its wider sense, 
    economic growth implies raising the standard of living of the people, and 
    reducing inequalities of income distribution. All economists agree that 
    economic growth is a desirable goal for a country. But there is no agreement 
    over for instance the annual growth rate which an economy should attain.
    d) Balance of Payment Equilibrium
    Another objectives of macroeconomic policy since the 1950s has been to
    maintain equilibrium in the balance of payments. The achievement of this goal 
    has been necessitated by the phenomenal growth in the world trade as against
    the growth of international liquidity. It is also recognised that deficit in the
    balance of payment will retard the attainment of other objectives. This is 
    because a deficit in the balance of payment leads to sizeable outflow of gold. 
    But ―it is not clear what constitute a satisfactory balance of payment position 
    but clearly a country with a net debt must be at a surplus to repay the debt over 
    a reasonably short period of time. Once any debt has been repaid and an� adequate reserve attain, zero balance maintenance over time would meet the 
    policy objective.
    e) Equitable Income Redistribution
    Generally, market system does not distribute income equitably because through 
    this system country productive resources are just distributed to where they are 
    mostly needed (efficient and effective distribution) without considering what 
    happen to the rest of the economy. The result of this is the skewness in national 
    resources distribution. To correct for this defect, government need to step-in 
    using mainly fiscal policy to redistribute income in order to promote general 
    well being by using the tax instrument to collect from those who earn more and 
    give to those that earn less through provision of social safety net..
    Self Assessment Exercise:
    i. List and explain macroeconomic policy objectives known to you